<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Section NE-3B 1998 Conclave Neckerchief and Patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/</link>
	<description>Collecting New York State OA, one patch at a time.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/#comment-16196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/#comment-16196</guid>
		<description>Ajapeu 351 was definitely moved to NE-1A as a result of the '97 Realignment. However, VT does have close ties with upstate NY, and was in NE-2A from 1989-94. It's certainly possible that they sent a small contingent to visit; however, being listed on the patch means (at least to me) that they officially attended, even being out of that section-- which does happen.

I believe that they also attended their NE-1A conclave in 1998. The only picture I can find of that year's patch is very hard to read. It does list nine lodges, but I'd like to confirm that the numbers do include 351: http://www.oasections.com/docs/NE-1A%201998%20conclave%20pp.jpg

I'll post any new info I can find.

-RH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajapeu 351 was definitely moved to NE-1A as a result of the &#8216;97 Realignment. However, VT does have close ties with upstate NY, and was in NE-2A from 1989-94. It&#8217;s certainly possible that they sent a small contingent to visit; however, being listed on the patch means (at least to me) that they officially attended, even being out of that section&#8211; which does happen.</p>
<p>I believe that they also attended their NE-1A conclave in 1998. The only picture I can find of that year&#8217;s patch is very hard to read. It does list nine lodges, but I&#8217;d like to confirm that the numbers do include 351: <a href="http://www.oasections.com/docs/NE-1A%201998%20conclave%20pp.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.oasections.com/docs/NE-1A%201998%20conclave%20pp.jpg</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post any new info I can find.</p>
<p>-RH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meacham</title>
		<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/#comment-14994</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meacham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 06:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/11/26/section-ne-3b-1998-conclave-neckerchief-and-patch/#comment-14994</guid>
		<description>If I were to take a guess, I would say that the turtle is from the impending merger of Ganienkeh #19 and Wakpominee #48 to form Haudenosaunee #19, whose totem was a turtle. This may also explain the phrase "Brothers Change, But Traditions Remain."

I would also say that portions, if not all, of Ajapeu #351 were invited to the attend the event, perhaps because of one lodge's proximity to the other. Similar to the joint conclave of NE-3A and NE-3B in 1995.

This, of course, is just a hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were to take a guess, I would say that the turtle is from the impending merger of Ganienkeh #19 and Wakpominee #48 to form Haudenosaunee #19, whose totem was a turtle. This may also explain the phrase &#8220;Brothers Change, But Traditions Remain.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would also say that portions, if not all, of Ajapeu #351 were invited to the attend the event, perhaps because of one lodge&#8217;s proximity to the other. Similar to the joint conclave of NE-3A and NE-3B in 1995.</p>
<p>This, of course, is just a hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.610 seconds -->
