<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kamargo Lodge #294 X1.5 and X2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/03/31/kamargo-lodge-294-x15-and-x2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/03/31/kamargo-lodge-294-x15-and-x2/</link>
	<description>Collecting New York State OA, one patch at a time.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: New York OA Trader &#124; A Look Back - Kamargo Lodge #294 X1.5 and X2</title>
		<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/03/31/kamargo-lodge-294-x15-and-x2/#comment-16079</link>
		<dc:creator>New York OA Trader &#124; A Look Back - Kamargo Lodge #294 X1.5 and X2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/?p=735#comment-16079</guid>
		<description>[...] A year ago we posted on the Kamargo Lodge #284 X1.5 and X2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A year ago we posted on the Kamargo Lodge #284 X1.5 and X2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/03/31/kamargo-lodge-294-x15-and-x2/#comment-10148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/?p=735#comment-10148</guid>
		<description>Dave-
Makes sense to me also....
-Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave-<br />
Makes sense to me also&#8230;.<br />
-Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/2007/03/31/kamargo-lodge-294-x15-and-x2/#comment-10133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyoatrader.com/blog/?p=735#comment-10133</guid>
		<description>I would agree with the N1.7 argument.  If you would actually have to cut a hole in the neckerchief to get one off, then it's part of the neckerchief and not a patch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with the N1.7 argument.  If you would actually have to cut a hole in the neckerchief to get one off, then it&#8217;s part of the neckerchief and not a patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.625 seconds -->
